Software development assisted by AI: what really changes in the work of developers

In recent years, the term AI has become ubiquitous in software development. It is no longer a research topic or experimental prototypes: the AI coding assistant is now a daily reality for thousands of developers around the world. Tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codeium, Tabnine, or next-generation language models have changed the workflow and the relationship between developer and code.

But what really changes? Is it just a shortcut to write faster or a revolution comparable to the arrival of web frameworks or distributed versioning systems? In this article, we analyze the benefits, limitations, best practices, and concrete impacts of AI-assisted software development.

It seems that the text you intended to provide for translation is missing. Please provide the text you’d like translated, and I’ll be happy to assist you!

From the Intelligent IDE to AI Assistants

Developers have always sought tools that speed up code writing. As early as the 2000s, IDEs (Visual Studio, Eclipse, IntelliJ) offered features like code completion, automatic refactoring, and static analysis.

The arrival of large language models has made a significant leap: we are no longer limited to completing already started functions, but we can describe in natural language what we want to achieve and obtain entire blocks of code, unit tests, or even configuration files. It is a paradigm shift that has paved the way for conversational development.

It seems that the text you want to translate is missing. Please provide the text you would like to have translated to English, and I’ll be happy to assist you!

Concrete Benefits of AI in Development

The use of AI in the software development cycle is not just a matter of speed. The most tangible benefits are:

1. Increased Productivity

• Automatic generation of boilerplate functions (e.g., validations, CRUD, API client).
• Rapid creation of unit tests consistent with the code.
• Refactoring suggestions to reduce complexity.

According to various internal studies by GitHub and Microsoft, the use of Copilot results in an average time savings of 20–40% in repetitive tasks.

2. Error Reduction

AI models, if well-trained, are capable of avoiding syntactical errors or flagging common vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS). This does not replace a code review, but reduces first-level bugs.

3. Learning Support

For junior developers, having a “virtual tutor” means being able to understand patterns and conventions without searching through dozens of tutorials. AI explains in natural language what a piece of code does.

4. Automatically Generated Documentation

AI assistants can write comments, README files, changelogs, and even API documentation snippets, keeping an up-to-date informational base.

It seems that you haven’t provided any text to translate. Please share the text you’d like me to translate, and I’ll be happy to assist you!

Limits and Risks of AI in Development

Despite the benefits, there are significant limitations that every team must consider.

1. Hallucinations and Erroneous Code

LLMs do not have a “real” understanding of code: they generate plausible patterns. This can lead to suggestions syntactically correct but semantically wrong.

2. Licensing and Copyright Issues

Some templates may propose code derived from open source repositories with restrictive licenses. It is essential to adopt tools that ensure traceability and compliance with licenses.

3. Technological Lock-in

Relying on a single AI vendor poses lock-in risks. If the model becomes paid or changes policy, the company finds itself constrained.

4. Governance and Security

An AI assistant can suggest unsafe practices. Therefore, a system of constant review and audit is necessary, especially in regulated sectors (finance, healthcare, public administration).

It seems that the text you intended to provide for translation is missing. Please provide the text you would like me to translate to English, and I will be happy to assist you!

Best practice for integrating AI into the workflow

AI should be used as an accelerator, not as a substitute. Here are some useful guidelines:

1. Pair programming AI + human: the programmer remains responsible, the AI assists with suggestions.
2. Continuous testing: every generated code must be verified with unit and integration tests.
3. Governance: define internal policies on where and how to use AI (e.g., prohibiting the inclusion of sensitive data in prompts).
4. Feedback loop: encourage teams to assess the quality and usefulness of suggestions.
5. Training: teach developers to write effective prompts and to recognize when the AI is wrong.

It seems that you haven’t provided any text to translate. Please share the text you’d like me to translate, and I’ll be happy to help!

Impacts on Professional Roles

Junior developer

AI lowers the entry barrier, but it risks limiting the ability to learn “from the ground up.” It is important to balance the use of AI with learning the fundamentals.

Senior developer

They become curators and validators rather than just simple coders. Their role shifts towards architecture, security, optimization, and mentoring.

CTO and Managers

They must introduce AI tools without creating excessive dependencies, establishing clear metrics (KPIs) to measure the impact on productivity and quality.

It seems that you haven’t provided the text you want to be translated. Please share the text, and I’ll be happy to assist you with the translation!

A glance at the future

The next step is agentic AI, where assistants do not just write code but can execute end-to-end tasks: clone a repository, run tests, create issues on GitHub, open pull requests. It is an evolution that will require greater control and auditing, but promises to radically transform the DevOps cycle.

At the same time, there will be an increased focus on accessibility, security, and regulatory compliance: no company can afford to integrate AI without ensuring transparency and accountability.

It seems that there is no text provided for translation. Please provide the text you would like to be translated to English, and I’ll be happy to assist you!

Conclusion

AI-assisted software development is not a passing trend. It is a structural change that is redefining timelines, roles, and skills in the industry. Developers should not fear replacement but seize the opportunity to work faster, with fewer errors, and with greater attention to design and strategy.

The key is to find a balance between AI power and human responsibility: only then does innovation become sustainable and deliver real value.

It seems that the text you intended to provide for translation is missing. Please provide the text you would like me to translate, and I’ll be happy to assist you!

➡️ Do you want to discover how to introduce AI into your company’s development processes? Contact me for targeted consulting.